Five vows, twice over.
Non-violence, truth, non-stealing, celibacy and non-possession — taken absolutely by monastics as mahavratas, and taken proportioned by the laity as anuvratas, with limits declared in advance on how far you will travel, how much you will own and what trades you will touch. The religion is built on the honest admission that a householder cannot do the full thing.
The five vows are the structural core, and Jainism's honesty about the gap between the monastic and lay versions is what distinguishes it. Monastics take the mahavratas — ahimsa, satya, asteya, brahmacharya and aparigraha — without qualification, without exception and for life. Householders take the anuvratas, the same five explicitly limited: non-violence extended to all mobile beings but not achievable toward one-sensed ones; truth in matters that count; non-stealing in trade; fidelity rather than celibacy; and non-possession expressed as a self-imposed ceiling on wealth. To these are added three gunavratas and four shikshavratas, twelve lay vows in all, several of which involve declaring limits in advance — the direction and distance you will travel, the things you will consume, the trades you will engage in — so that all the harm outside the declared boundary is renounced in advance. This is a genuinely clever piece of moral engineering: it makes the finite householder responsible for a bounded rather than an unbounded field, and it makes the limits explicit and public rather than aspirational.
The same ground, other faiths
claims that share this one's ideasSign in to open the first thread. Everything here is attributed.