The shrine is where the kami is invited.
Many shrines have no image at all — the object in the sanctuary is a mirror, a stone or a sword that the kami is asked to occupy, and at Ise the whole structure is rebuilt from scratch every twenty years without the kami being thought to lose anything. Some shrines have no building, only a mountain.
What sits in the inner sanctuary is usually a shintai, a body of the kami — most often a mirror, sometimes a sword or a jewel or a stone — and it is not an image of anything. It is a vessel the kami is asked to occupy, and it is generally never seen; at many shrines no living person has looked at it. Some shrines have no sanctuary at all: Ōmiwa in Nara worships Mount Miwa itself and has only a hall of worship with the mountain behind it, and there are shrines whose object is a waterfall or a rock formation. The most striking demonstration of the principle is Ise, where the entire complex is demolished and rebuilt on the adjacent plot every twenty years and the kami is simply moved across — the sanctity is not in the timber. This is a very different relationship between the sacred and the material object than the one that produced the iconoclastic controversies further west.
The same ground, other faiths
claims that share this one's ideasSign in to open the first thread. Everything here is attributed.