The Truths are interrogatives.
Terasem states that its Truths are revisited by participants every four years at a quadrennial convocation. A religion with a scheduled revision cycle written into it is a genuinely unusual object.
Terasem describes its Truths as interrogatives revisited by participants every four years at a quadrennial convocation, which is a genuinely unusual constitutional arrangement. Most traditions on this site treat their founding statements as fixed and handle change by reinterpretation; Terasem schedules the revision. The four propositions are short enough to function as a creed and are treated as questions rather than assertions, which the movement presents as the difference between a transreligion and a religion. Whether a scheduled revision cycle produces genuine revisability or merely ratifies whatever the founders currently think is not something a movement this small has generated enough history to answer.
The same ground, other faiths
claims that share this one's ideasSign in to open the first thread. Everything here is attributed.