Being ridden.
The vocabulary is explicit — the orisha mounts the devotee as a rider mounts a horse — and the person has no memory afterwards and is told what happened. The community does not accept every instance: what is watched is whether the behaviour is characteristic of that particular orisha, and a false one is spotted.
Possession is the tradition's central experiential claim and the terminology is unambiguous: the elegun, the one who is mounted, is the horse; the orisha is the rider. It occurs at drumming ceremonies, is generally confined to people who have been initiated and prepared, and is not sought individually — the orisha takes whom it takes. The mounted person is attended so they are not injured, may be dressed in the orisha's cloth and handed its emblems, and behaves as that orisha behaves: Shango's abruptness, Osun's coquetry, Obatala's slow dignity, Oya's violence. They speak, prescribe, bless and rebuke, and afterwards report no memory whatever and are informed by others. The community's scepticism is real and operates on behavioural grounds — a performance that does not match the known character of the orisha claimed is identified as false. Anthropologists have studied the phenomenon extensively; the tradition's own account is simply that the orisha is present.
The same ground, other faiths
claims that share this one's ideasSign in to open the first thread. Everything here is attributed.