Zoroastrianism

Tradition·Founded c. 1200 BCE·est. 100–200 thousand worldwide

Zoroastrianism

Branch
Precept of Zoroastrianism

A contract has a god in it.

Mithra's name is the word for covenant, and to break one is to injure him. The Mihr Yasht says he ruins the house and the country of the man who lies to a contract, and it specifies that a contract with a follower of the lie binds just as tightly as one with the faithful — the obligation does not depend on who you made it with.

What it asksKeep your word. A contract is a thing with a god attached to it
Who it bindsEveryone, and Mithra is the enforcer — the word for contract and the god's name are the same word
Where it bitesThe Mihr Yasht is explicit that Mithra destroys the house of the man who lies to a contract, and that this applies to agreements with unbelievers too
Understanding it — context, not catechism: how this passage is held

Mithra's name is the word for contract, and the Mihr Yasht, the tenth hymn of the Avesta, is largely about what happens to people who break one. He is described as destroying the house, village, district and country of the contract-breaker; his thousand ears and ten thousand eyes make evasion impossible. The passage that repays attention specifies that a contract made with a follower of the lie is as binding as one made with a follower of the truth — the obligation attaches to the agreement itself and not to the worthiness of the counterparty, which forecloses the standard route by which religious communities excuse themselves from promises to outsiders. Persian sources and Greek observers alike make truth-telling the defining Persian virtue; Herodotus reports that Persian boys were taught to ride, to shoot straight and to speak the truth, and that the worst disgrace was to lie, with owing a debt reckoned second because a debtor is driven to lying.

From the sources — the passages this rests on; concise renderings, cited

Do not break the contract, O Spitama — neither the one you make with a follower of the lie, nor the one you make with a follower of truth. For the contract holds good with both.

Mihr Yasht, Yasht 10.2 (rendered)

The obligation attaches to the agreement, not to the worthiness of the other party.

All sources for Zoroastrianism →

The same ground, other faiths

claims that share this one's ideas
The nikah — a contract with terms. Islam · rite Go deeper →
Swearing on iron. Yoruba Religion Go deeper →
Do not promise what you will not do. Haitian Vodou Go deeper →
The 1890 Manifesto was a surrender, not a revelation. The Fundamentalist Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-Day Saints · core tenet Go deeper →
The dharma of one's station. Hinduism Go deeper →
The Five Precepts. Buddhism Go deeper →

The conversation

argument stays attached to the claim it is about All discussion →

Sign in to open the first thread. Everything here is attributed.

Built on Hatchable