Turn the other cheek — and the argument about war.
The historic peace churches read the Sermon on the Mount as forbidding violence outright and have paid for that reading in every conscription since. The rest of the tradition uses just war doctrine, which permits force under conditions it then finds ways to satisfy. Both sides quote the same chapter.
The historic peace churches — Mennonites, Quakers, the Church of the Brethren — read the Sermon on the Mount as forbidding violence outright and have paid for it in every conscription of the modern era, with members jailed in both world wars and Mennonite communities repeatedly migrating to escape military service. The rest of the tradition uses just war doctrine, developed by Augustine and refined by Aquinas: right authority, just cause, right intention, proportionality, last resort, reasonable prospect of success. The honest criticism of it is that no state has ever failed to satisfy the criteria to its own satisfaction. The honest criticism of pacifism is that it is a position a minority can hold because a majority does not. Both sides quote the same chapter, and the argument has run for nineteen centuries without either winning.
But I say unto you, That ye resist not evil: but whosoever shall smite thee on thy right cheek, turn to him the other also.
Matthew 5:39 (KJV)The peace churches and the just war tradition both build from this chapter.
The same ground, other faiths
claims that share this one's ideasSign in to open the first thread. Everything here is attributed.
