T Figure of Jediism

The Force.

Taken from a film and then taken seriously. Jedi do not claim the films are scripture; they claim the films described something the tradition had already noticed, in the same way a novel can describe grief accurately without inventing it.

Names & titlesThe Force
DomainAll living things, and what passes between them
RelationsNot a person and not addressed as one
Depicted asNot depicted
StandingTaken by most Jedi as a real field rather than a metaphor, and by a minority as the second
Understanding it — context, not catechism: how this passage is held

The awkward fact at the centre of Jediism is that its central concept was written by a screenwriter in the 1970s, and Jedi handle it more gracefully than outsiders expect. They do not claim the films are scripture, do not treat George Lucas as a prophet, and generally hold that the films described something already true in the way a novel can describe grief accurately without inventing grief. The Force as they use it is assembled from Taoist qi, Stoic pneuma and a general Western esoteric vitalism, all of which predate the films by a long way. Where this leaves them legally is unsettled: no court has yet been asked whether a doctrine can be religious if its vocabulary is copyrighted, and the Charity Commission decision of 2016 did not reach the question.

The same ground, other faiths

claims that share this one's ideas
T The Three Pure Ones. Taoism Meet them →
Order and disorder are both things you are doing. Discordianism · core tenet Go deeper →
Atman and Brahman are one — the self is the absolute. Hinduism · core tenet Go deeper →
All things arise dependently. Buddhism · core tenet Go deeper →
Syadvada — the sevenfold answer. Jainism · core tenet Go deeper →

The conversation

argument stays attached to the claim it is about All discussion →

Sign in to open the first thread. Everything here is attributed.

Built on Hatchable