The Force.
Taken from a film and then taken seriously. Jedi do not claim the films are scripture; they claim the films described something the tradition had already noticed, in the same way a novel can describe grief accurately without inventing it.
The awkward fact at the centre of Jediism is that its central concept was written by a screenwriter in the 1970s, and Jedi handle it more gracefully than outsiders expect. They do not claim the films are scripture, do not treat George Lucas as a prophet, and generally hold that the films described something already true in the way a novel can describe grief accurately without inventing grief. The Force as they use it is assembled from Taoist qi, Stoic pneuma and a general Western esoteric vitalism, all of which predate the films by a long way. Where this leaves them legally is unsettled: no court has yet been asked whether a doctrine can be religious if its vocabulary is copyrighted, and the Charity Commission decision of 2016 did not reach the question.
The same ground, other faiths
claims that share this one's ideasSign in to open the first thread. Everything here is attributed.