The Sunday Assembly

Movement·Founded 2013 CE

The Sunday Assembly

Branch
Core tenet of The Sunday Assembly⚖ contested within

Whether a congregation with no doctrine can hold together.

Part of the New York branch split off wanting a harder atheist line, and the movement has lost roughly half its chapters since its peak. This is the open question and the Assembly is the experiment.

Understanding it — context, not catechism: how this passage is held

This is the live question, and the Assembly is the clearest natural experiment anyone has run on it. Growth was extremely fast — from one room in Islington in January 2013 to dozens of cities within two years, with around seventy chapters at the peak — and the contraction was almost as fast, with roughly half closing or going dormant and forty-eight locations recorded as of December 2019. Part of the New York branch split away early, wanting more emphasis on atheism than the founders were comfortable with, and New York assemblies stopped organising in 2016. The structural diagnosis offered by both supporters and critics is the same: a congregation held together only by a running order depends entirely on two or three volunteers per city, and when they burn out there is no doctrine, no clergy and no obligation to bring anyone back.

The same ground, other faiths

claims that share this one's ideas
Two Buddhisms in the same city. Buddhism · community Go deeper →
The movements. Judaism · community Go deeper →
Four schools, one law. Sunni Islam Go deeper →
The temple on the street. Taoism · community Go deeper →
Is it a religion. Confucianism · community Go deeper →

The conversation

argument stays attached to the claim it is about All discussion →

Sign in to open the first thread. Everything here is attributed.

Built on Hatchable