The ledger of merit and demerit.
A printed book with a scoring system: saving a life is a hundred merits, speaking harshly to a parent is a demerit, and you total the day before bed. It was a mass practice among the late imperial gentry. Its own compilers raised the obvious objection — that scoring corrupts the act — and answered that the habit outlives the motive.
Gongguoge, ledgers of merit and demerit, are printed moral accounting books that became a mass practice in the late Ming and Qing, particularly among the gentry, and the best known is associated with Yuan Huang in the sixteenth century. They assign numerical values: saving a human life might be a hundred merits, saving an animal a smaller number, arranging a marriage or funding a burial for the poor so many, while cursing a parent, cheating in trade or aborting a pregnancy carry specified demerits. The user totals the day's score each night in a ruled book and carries a running balance, on the understanding that the celestial bureaucracy keeps the same accounts and that the balance determines lifespan, offspring and fortune. The obvious objection — that acting for points is not virtue — was raised inside the tradition, and the standard answer was pedagogical: begin by calculating, and the habit of doing good will eventually detach from the calculation. Their circulation crossed traditions, with Buddhist and Confucian versions in wide use.
The same ground, other faiths
claims that share this one's ideasSign in to open the first thread. Everything here is attributed.