The fall on the ice at Lynn.
On a February evening in 1866 Eddy slipped on ice, was carried to a house and, on the third day, read the healing of the palsied man in Matthew 9 and got up. The attending physician later disputed how badly she had been hurt, and the argument over that disputed fact has run for a hundred and fifty years.
The Lynn fall is the founding event and it is contested in its particulars. Eddy's account, given in Science and Health and at greater length in Retrospection and Introspection, is that she was severely injured, that her recovery was not expected, and that on the third day she read Matthew 9:2 and rose healed. Dr Alvin M. Cushing, who attended her, later gave a sworn statement that he had not considered her in danger. Whether the injury was grave is not a detail the movement can concede, because the healing is offered as the first demonstration of the principle. Willa Cather and Georgine Milmine's hostile serial in McClure's in 1907-08, and later Eddy's authorised biographers, fought over exactly this. The episode is a fair illustration of the whole: a claim advanced as evidence, disputed on the evidence, and held regardless.
The same ground, other faiths
claims that share this one's ideasSign in to open the first thread. Everything here is attributed.