Salt in the water.
The father tells the son to dissolve salt in water overnight and then find it. He cannot, but it is in every mouthful, top and bottom. That is the setup for the sentence Advaita has been arguing from ever since.
The sixth chapter of the Chandogya is a father teaching a son who has come home from twelve years of study insufferably pleased with himself, and the father's opening move is to ask whether he learned the teaching by which the unheard becomes heard. He then runs a series of demonstrations: fruit cut open to a seed and the seed cut open to nothing; a tree cut and still living; salt dissolved into water. Each ends with the same refrain, that the subtle essence is the self of all this, and you are that. Shankara built Advaita on the sentence and reads it as a flat statement of identity. Ramanuja reads it as predication of a qualified whole. Madhva, remarkably, reads the Sanskrit as sa atmā tat tvam asi and gets you are not that — a reading almost nobody outside his school accepts, and a good illustration of how much of Indian theology is grammar under pressure.
That which is the subtlest essence — this whole world has it for its self. That is the real. That is the self. You are that, Shvetaketu.
Chandogya Upanishad 6.8.7 (rendered)Repeated nine times in the chapter, and read three incompatible ways by three schools of Vedanta.
The same ground, other faiths
claims that share this one's ideasSign in to open the first thread. Everything here is attributed.
