Sheep without a shepherd, and a priest who had known.
Menno wrote that after the Oldeklooster he could no longer bear the sound of his own preaching. The story Mennonites tell about their founder is not a conversion in a flash of light but a slow, shameful arithmetic — that he had been right for years and comfortable for just as long.
Menno told this story about himself in the Reply to Gellius Faber of 1554, which is the closest thing to an autobiography he wrote. The sequence he gives is unflattering by design: he doubted the mass in 1525 and kept saying it; he read the New Testament and found no infant baptism and kept baptising infants; a man named Sicke Freerks was beheaded at Leeuwarden in 1531 for being rebaptised and he was merely startled; and only the killing at the Oldeklooster in April 1535 moved him, because his own brother was among the dead. Mennonite preaching uses the story against complacency rather than for inspiration. The point is the nine wasted years, not the resignation.
The same ground, other faiths
claims that share this one's ideasSign in to open the first thread. Everything here is attributed.