The teaching bends to the hearer.
Upaya, skillful means: what gets said depends on who is listening and what will actually free them. It is why the canon contradicts itself, and why the tradition does not read that as a defect.
Skillful means is the tradition's explanation for its own inconsistency, and it is offered without embarrassment. A teaching is a tool aimed at a particular listener's particular knot; a different listener gets a different tool, and the tools may contradict. The Lotus Sutra gives it the famous illustration — a father promises his children three kinds of cart to get them out of a burning house, and gives them all one better cart, and is not judged a liar. Critics inside and outside the tradition point out how easily this licenses saying anything, and the counter-check offered is functional: the test of a teaching is whether it reduces suffering, not whether it is doctrinally tidy.
The same ground, other faiths
claims that share this one's ideasSign in to open the first thread. Everything here is attributed.
