There is a judgment, and something is at stake in it.
Eternal conscious punishment is the historic majority position. Annihilationists hold that the lost simply cease. Universalists hold that everyone is finally restored, a reading Gregory of Nyssa held openly and a version of which was condemned in 553. The question is louder now than it has been in centuries.
Hell is where Christianity's internal disagreement has widened fastest in living memory. The traditional Western picture — conscious, unending punishment — was near-universal from Augustine to the nineteenth century and is still the official teaching of Rome, Orthodoxy and most conservative Protestantism, though Orthodox writers increasingly describe it as the experience of God's unveiled love by someone who does not want it, rather than as a separate place of torture. Annihilationism, or conditional immortality, holds that the lost are destroyed rather than tormented, and now has serious evangelical defenders. Universal restoration, apokatastasis, was held openly by Gregory of Nyssa, who was never condemned for it, and in a form attributed to Origen was anathematised in 553; David Bentley Hart's 2019 defence of it made the argument mainstream enough to be shouted about. What has actually changed is the preaching. Hell was a staple of the sermon for a millennium and a half and is now nearly absent from Western pulpits of every stripe, which is a bigger shift than any doctrinal statement.
All shall be well, and all shall be well, and all manner of thing shall be well.
Julian of Norwich, Revelations of Divine Love, c. 1373 (rendered)Written by someone who also saw hell in her visions and could not reconcile the two, and said so.
The same ground, other faiths
claims that share this one's ideasSign in to open the first thread. Everything here is attributed.
