The mean, and the timing.
Not compromise and not moderation as a temperament — the exactly appropriate response to this situation, which may be extreme. The tradition's highest praise for Confucius was that he was the sage of timeliness: the one who knew when to serve, when to leave, and when to say nothing.
Zhongyong is conventionally rendered the doctrine of the mean and the translation invites a misreading, because it does not mean moderation as a disposition or splitting the difference. It means hitting the centre — the response exactly fitted to this situation — and the fitting response may be extreme. The second character, yong, carries the sense of the ordinary or the constant, so the term also implies that this precision is to be exercised in everyday life rather than reserved for crises. Mencius sharpens it with the notion of timeliness, and calls Confucius the sage of the timely — the one who took office when it was right to, left when it was right to, stayed when it was right to stay. The counter-example he gives is holding to the middle without weighing circumstances, which he says is as bad as holding to one extreme, because it fixes what ought to be responsive.
The same ground, other faiths
claims that share this one's ideasSign in to open the first thread. Everything here is attributed.