The Tao that can be named is not the eternal Tao.
The source and current of all things escapes every definition — the first line of the Tao Te Ching is a warning about all the lines that follow.
The Tao Te Ching opens by disqualifying its own subject: whatever can be pinned down in language is not the thing. This is not mysticism for its own sake — it is a claim about categories, that naming carves the world into pieces the world does not actually have, and that the carving is where trouble starts. Everything downstream follows: if the Way cannot be stated, it can only be aligned with, which is why Taoism produced practices and paradoxes rather than a creed.
The same ground, other faiths
claims that share this one's ideasSign in to open the first thread. Everything here is attributed.