Mencius — nature is good.
Anyone seeing a child fall toward a well moves without calculating: from that flinch of the heart, Mencius argued the whole tradition.
Mencius supplied the argument Confucianism needed: that human nature is good. His demonstration is a thought experiment — anyone seeing a child about to fall into a well feels alarm, before any calculation of advantage — and from that flinch he derives four innate sprouts that education cultivates rather than installs. His rival Xunzi held the opposite, that nature is crooked and must be straightened by ritual, and the debate between them is East Asia's version of a question the West has run through Rousseau and Hobbes.
The same ground, other faiths
claims that share this one's ideasSign in to open the first thread. Everything here is attributed.