Xunzi.
He argued that human nature is bad and that everything good is deliberate construction — ritual is the artifice that makes people fit to live together, and Heaven is regular and impersonal and does not care. It is the most rigorous position in the tradition, and it got him expelled from the Confucian temple in 1530.
Xunzi is the most systematic thinker the tradition produced and its longest-standing embarrassment. He argued that human nature is bad and goodness is deliberate construction; that Heaven is a regular natural process with no moral intentions, so that praying for rain is theatre and irrigation is agriculture; and that ritual is a human invention for shaping desire, which is precisely why it is indispensable. His chapters on learning, on the rectification of names and on dispelling obsession are the closest early China comes to sustained analytical philosophy. He also taught Han Fei and Li Si, the two figures most associated with the Legalism that ran the Qin — which the later tradition never forgave, though the connection is more about method than doctrine. He was removed from the Confucian temple in 1530 during a Ming purification of the canon, and his tablet was not restored until 1919. Twentieth-century scholarship, Chinese and Western, has largely rehabilitated him, and a number of contemporary philosophers regard him as the more defensible Confucian.
The same ground, other faiths
claims that share this one's ideasSign in to open the first thread. Everything here is attributed.