Branch
Core tenet of Heaven's Gate

The kingdom of heaven is a physical place and you get there in a craft.

The group read the gospels as a literal account of visitors: the Next Level is a real civilisation, its members have bodies, and the resurrection was a transfer. This is why the teaching has no mysticism in it at all — it is closer to an emigration procedure than to a devotion.

Understanding it — context, not catechism: how this passage is held

Heaven's Gate is the clearest case in this set of a group whose theology is stated plainly and in its own words, at length, and is still available to read. Applewhite and Nettles took the Christian resurrection accounts as descriptions of a physical transfer and worked outward from there. Angels became Next Level members, the kingdom of heaven became a location, and Jesus became an earlier instance of the same programme. There is no mysticism in the material and almost no emotion; the register is procedural throughout. Read cold, it is a theory of emigration, with entry requirements, a curriculum and a departure date.

The same ground, other faiths

claims that share this one's ideas
The boy who waited three days at Death's door. Hinduism · story Read it in full →
The soul goes on, and keeps going. The Bahá'í Faith Go deeper →
The dead will rise. Judaism Go deeper →
Christ will come again. Christianity Go deeper →

The conversation

argument stays attached to the claim it is about All discussion →

Sign in to open the first thread. Everything here is attributed.

Built on Hatchable