Shambuka.
A brahmin's son dies, and the sages tell Rama the cause is a shudra performing austerities, which this age does not permit. Rama finds Shambuka and beheads him, and the boy revives.
The Shambuka episode appears in the Uttara Kanda, the last book of the Ramayana, which many scholars and many Hindus regard as a later addition — the same book contains Sita's banishment. In it, a brahmin brings his dead son to Rama's court and blames the death on adharma somewhere in the kingdom; the sage Narada identifies the cause as a shudra performing tapas, which the treta yuga does not permit. Rama searches, finds Shambuka hanging upside down over a fire, confirms his caste, and kills him, at which the child revives and the gods approve. It is the single most cited passage in the anti-caste critique of Hinduism. Defenders argue interpolation, or read it allegorically, or note that other recensions handle it differently. It has also been rewritten repeatedly from inside the tradition: Bhavabhuti dramatised it in the eighth century with visible discomfort, and twentieth-century Tamil, Marathi and Malayalam writers have staged it as a straightforward indictment, some of them prosecuted for doing so.
The same ground, other faiths
claims that share this one's ideasSign in to open the first thread. Everything here is attributed.
