The Plymouth Brethren

Movement·Founded 1827 CE·Unknowable by design. The Open Brethren keep no central roll — assemblies are autonomous and many list themselves as no more than a Gospel Hall — and the various Exclusive connexions publish nothing except the Plymouth Brethren Christian Church, which reports just over 55,000. Estimates for the whole movement run to well over a million worldwide, heavily weighted toward India, Africa and Latin America, and none of them is from a source that counts.

Judaism → Christianity → Catholicism → Protestantism → The Plymouth Brethren → 1 branch

ArchiveSTEM Publishing — the Darby, Kelly and Mackintosh corpusArchiveMyBrethren — early Brethren history and ministry

Branch
Overview Belief 3How to Live 1Practice 1Stories & Scripture 2 You × The Plymouth Brethren Discussion
Precept of The Plymouth Brethren

Separation — and the argument over how far it reaches.

Everyone agreed that separation from the denominations was required. What split the movement in 1848 was whether a person from an assembly holding error is thereby defiled, so that receiving him defiles you too. The Exclusive answer was yes, and the logic of it has been running ever since.

Add to My Beliefs →
What it asksSeparation from what the movement calls the ruin — the denominations, and the world's systems
Who it bindsThose in fellowship at the table
Where it bitesAt Bethesda Chapel, Bristol, in 1848, and at every division since
Understanding it — context, not catechism: how this passage is held

The practical question that divided the movement was whether ecclesiastical defilement is transmissible. If an assembly tolerates error, is a person coming from that assembly himself defiled, and does receiving him defile the receiving assembly? The Open position is that each assembly judges each individual on their own faith and walk. The Exclusive position, which Darby set out and pressed, is that assemblies are linked, that a judgement in one is a judgement in all, and that receiving from a defiled table defiles your own. The second position is logically consistent and produces indefinite subdivision, because every subsequent disagreement about whether a particular assembly is defiled becomes itself a ground of separation. The Exclusive line divided in 1881 over Ramsgate, in 1885 over F. E. Raven's teaching on the person of Christ, in 1908, and repeatedly through the twentieth century.

The same ground, other faiths

claims that share this one's ideas
Conversion. Judaism · community Go deeper →
Tying the dastar. Sikhism · rite Go deeper →
Keep the boundaries. Yazidism Go deeper →
Meidung, and what it has cost. The Amish (Old Order) · community Go deeper →
The split started on a mission field in China. The Christian Churches and Churches of Christ · story Read it in full →
Separation from evil is God's principle of unity. The Plymouth Brethren Christian Church (the Exclusive Brethren) · core tenet Go deeper →

The conversation

argument stays attached to the claim it is about All discussion →

Sign in to open the first thread. Everything here is attributed.

Where next

The Plymouth Brethren's How to Live roomback up one layer Propose a change to this passageone button — it routes to the review pool

Numbers count Panfaith activity only — never real-world adherence.

Built on Hatchable