Leningrad Codex carpet page, 1010 CE · public domain

Judaism

Tradition·Founded c. 1000 BCE·est. ~15 million worldwide

Judaism → 8 branches

Branch
Community of Judaism

Conversion.

Custom says to discourage an applicant three times — why take this on, from a people the world treats like this. Once through, the law is emphatic that reminding a convert of their origin is a specific prohibition, and the gap between that law and how converts are actually treated is a live grievance.

How you joinA year or more of study, a court of three, circumcision or a drop of blood for men, immersion for everyone. No oath of belief is administered
Who leadsA beit din. Whose beit din is the entire problem
The unitThe convert becomes a Jew completely — child of Abraham and Sarah, with no lesser status, and it is forbidden to mention their origin
Understanding it — context, not catechism: how this passage is held

Judaism does not seek converts, does not consider itself necessary for salvation, and has spent most of its history under regimes where accepting one carried a death penalty for both parties. The process is study — usually a year or more — then a beit din of three, then circumcision for men or, if already circumcised, a symbolic drop of blood, then immersion in a mikveh, which is the moment of change. No profession of faith is required. The customary triple discouragement comes from the story of Ruth and is taken seriously in Orthodox practice and much less so elsewhere. Once complete, the law is unambiguous: a convert is a full Jew, called son or daughter of Abraham and Sarah, and reminding them of their origin is a named prohibition — ona'at devarim — with the Talmud specifically forbidding saying to a convert, remember what your ancestors did. The reality falls short of that constantly, and converts say so. The institutional problem is recognition: Orthodox authorities do not accept Conservative or Reform conversions, Israel's Chief Rabbinate does not accept many Orthodox conversions performed abroad, and it has retroactively annulled conversions, which the Israeli Supreme Court has repeatedly had to constrain.

From the sources — the passages this rests on; concise renderings, cited

If a convert comes to convert, one says to them: what did you see that brought you to convert? Do you not know that Israel at this time is afflicted, oppressed, downtrodden and harried?

Talmud, Yevamot 47a (rendered)

The standard opening of a conversion interview, and not a rhetorical question when it was written.

The same ground, other faiths

claims that share this one's ideas
Tying the dastar. Sikhism · rite Go deeper →
Keep the boundaries. Yazidism · precept Go deeper →
Meidung, and what it has cost. The Amish (Old Order) Go deeper →
The split started on a mission field in China. The Christian Churches and Churches of Christ · story Read it in full →
The church on earth is in ruins, and no one can rebuild it. The Plymouth Brethren · core tenet Go deeper →
Separation from evil is God's principle of unity. The Plymouth Brethren Christian Church (the Exclusive Brethren) · core tenet Go deeper →

The conversation

argument stays attached to the claim it is about All discussion →

Sign in to open the first thread. Everything here is attributed.

Built on Hatchable