A changed heart and a disciplined church — neither alone.
The Pietist half asks whether you have been converted; the Anabaptist half asks whether the congregation can see it in how you live. The Brethren in Christ have insisted since the 1770s that a church which drops either question stops being one.
The Brethren in Christ are the clearest case in North America of a body standing on two Reformation inheritances at once. From the Anabaptists they took believers baptism, the church as a disciplined visible community, nonresistance, refusal of the oath, and the love feast; from radical Pietism they took the conversion narrative, the testimony meeting, and the expectation that religion is felt. The combination made them awkward to both parents: Mennonite neighbours thought the emotional preaching was excess, and the revivalists thought the discipline was legalism. The denomination's own historians, particularly in the Brethren in Christ History and Life journal, have run a century-long argument about which stream is primary, and the answer has shifted with the decades — Anabaptist in the 1960s and 1970s under the influence of the wider Mennonite renewal, more evangelical since.
The same ground, other faiths
claims that share this one's ideasSign in to open the first thread. Everything here is attributed.