Ordination.
The bishop lays on hands in silence — the silence is the ordination, not the words around it. Whether a given bishop stands in an unbroken line from the apostles is the technical question on which Rome, Constantinople, Canterbury and Geneva have refused to recognise each other for centuries.
The essential act is silence: the bishop lays both hands on the candidate's head and says nothing, and the prayer follows. Every priest already ordained who is present then lays on hands in turn, which makes the point that the man is being joined to an order rather than given a job. The technical question of whether a particular bishop stands in an unbroken chain from the apostles is what apostolic succession means in practice, and it is the sticking point in almost every ecumenical negotiation: Rome declared Anglican orders null in 1896, the Orthodox churches take various positions, and most Protestant churches reject the premise that the chain matters. Ordination is also the point where the sharpest current arguments land — who may be ordained, whether they may marry, and whether a church that ordains women or partnered gay clergy can still be recognised by one that does not.
The same ground, other faiths
rites that share this one's ideasSign in to open the first thread. Everything here is attributed.
