The scriptures that refused Sanskrit.
When Tulsidas wrote the Rama story in Awadhi in the sixteenth century the Varanasi pandits are said to have been furious; four centuries later his book is what north India means by the Ramayana. The vachana poets went further and attacked temples, priests and scripture by name, in prose-poems.
The vernacular turn is the most important thing that happened to Hinduism in the second millennium. Sanskrit is a restricted language with restricted access, and the bhakti poets wrote in what people spoke — which meant that women, labourers and untouchables could compose scripture, and did. Tulsidas's Ramcharitmanas is the clearest demonstration of scale: written in Awadhi in the 1570s, allegedly against fierce opposition from Sanskritists, and now the text north Indians quote, stage as Ramlila every autumn, and hear at all-night recitations. It is also more devotionally warm and more socially conservative than Valmiki, which is worth saying. The Marathi abhangs, the Kannada vachanas, Shankaradeva's Assamese Kirtan Ghosha and the Braj poetry of Surdas each anchored a regional religious world, and the vachanas in particular are formally extraordinary — short, first-person, argumentative, ending with the poet's signature phrase, and frequently rude about religion.
The same ground, other faiths
claims that share this one's ideasSign in to open the first thread. Everything here is attributed.
