The church on earth is in ruins, and no one can rebuild it.
The founding conviction: the visible church has failed so completely that no reformation or new denomination can restore it, and all a believer can do is leave the wreck and gather to the name of Christ with whoever else will. Every Brethren peculiarity follows from this one judgement.
The doctrine of the ruin of the church is the Brethren's foundational move and the source of both their strength and their fissility. Darby argued that the church as an outward, ordered institution had failed irrecoverably, that no restoration of apostolic order was possible, and that the only remaining ground on which believers could act was the ground of the one body — two or three gathered to the name of Christ, with no officers appointed and no name taken. This is why Brethren assemblies have no ordained ministry, no membership in the usual sense, no denominational name, and no central authority. It also removes every mechanism by which a disagreement could be contained, which is why a movement founded to end sectarianism has produced perhaps a dozen mutually exclusive connexions. Brethren writers on both sides say this openly.
Where two or three are gathered together in my name, there am I in the midst of them — this is the only ground on which the church can now be found, the ruin being confessed and no pretension made to restore what has been lost.
J. N. Darby, on the ruin of the church, from the Collected Writings, Ecclesiastical vol. I (rendered)Condensed from Darby, whose prose is notoriously dense; the position is stated repeatedly across the ecclesiastical volumes rather than in one place.
The same ground, other faiths
claims that share this one's ideasSign in to open the first thread. Everything here is attributed.