No one approaches the altar unreconciled.
The kiss of peace is passed hand to hand through the congregation before the anaphora, and the deacon's call to reconcile is not decorative. Priests routinely refuse communion to two parties in an open quarrel until they have met. In small communities where everyone is related, this is the most demanding rule the church has.
The requirement to be reconciled before communion is common to most historic churches; the Syriac practice is distinctive for how public it is. The kiss of peace travels physically through the congregation, so refusing it is visible to everyone. Clergy report that in tight communities the rule functions as a mediation mechanism, with the priest brokering settlements between families in the week before a great feast. It also gives the priest real leverage, which is not always used well, and complaints about clerical partiality in family disputes are among the most common brought to the synod.
The same ground, other faiths
claims that share this one's ideasSign in to open the first thread. Everything here is attributed.