Everything in one purse.
No member owns anything. Wages from the community businesses go into a common fund and everything comes back out of it, which the community reads as the plain sense of Acts 2 rather than as an ideal.
The common purse is not a policy but the membership test. Nobody owns anything; income from the Yellow Deli cafes, the farms, the soap and leather workshops goes into a common fund and everything comes back out of it. Members receive no wages and pay no rent. The community reads this straight out of Acts 2 and regards partial versions as evasions. It is also the point at which most external criticism lands: a member of many years who leaves has no savings, no employment record and no social-security contributions, and former members and labour regulators in several countries have raised exactly that.
The same ground, other faiths
claims that share this one's ideasSign in to open the first thread. Everything here is attributed.