The fall was an act of love in the wrong order.
Eve's fall is read as a sexual relationship with the archangel, and Adam's as its consequence — which is why the movement's remedy is a correctly ordered marriage rather than a sacrifice.
The Divine Principle reads Genesis 3 as an account of premature and misdirected love: Eve's relationship with the archangel Lucifer, and then with Adam before either was mature, transmitting a false lineage to everything that followed. It is a reading with medieval and Korean precedents but the movement states it more directly than most. Everything downstream depends on it — the emphasis on sexual purity, the centrality of marriage, the notion that the fall can be reversed by getting a marriage right. Christian critics answer that the text will not carry the weight; the movement answers that the conventional reading has never explained why the consequence was inherited.
The same ground, other faiths
claims that share this one's ideasSign in to open the first thread. Everything here is attributed.