You are choosing, right now.
The Gathas repeatedly address hearers as people who must decide between two ways, and insist the choice is real and unforced. There is no predestination, no inherited guilt and no original sin. A child is not accountable until initiation, and after it everything counts.
The Gathas are addressed to hearers as agents. Yasna 30 sets out two primal spirits who chose, describes them as better and bad in thought, word and act, and then tells the audience to choose rightly between them — and Yasna 31 asks Ahura Mazda directly for instruction so that people may choose knowingly. There is no predestination, no inherited sin, no fallen nature and no requirement for external rescue: a person's account is theirs, and the judgment at the bridge is arithmetic on thoughts, words and deeds. The corollary is that children are not accountable until initiation, which is why navjote matters so much. The tradition also has no doctrine of vicarious atonement — nobody else can pay for what you did — although later practice includes prayers and ceremonies performed on behalf of the dead, which sits somewhat awkwardly with the Gathic position and which reformists have noticed.
Now the two primal Spirits, who revealed themselves in vision as Twins, are the Better and the Bad in thought and word and action. And between these two the wise once chose aright, the foolish not so.
Gathas, Yasna 30.3 (rendered)The passage on which every argument about whether the religion is dualist or monotheist turns.
The same ground, other faiths
claims that share this one's ideasSign in to open the first thread. Everything here is attributed.