Borobudur at sunrise · Justine Hong · CC BY 2.0

Buddhism

Tradition·Founded c. 480 BCE·est. ~500 million worldwide

Vedic Religion → Buddhism → 3 branches

Branch
Core tenet of Buddhismheld by most

There are two truths, and both are true.

Conventionally there are chariots, persons and Tuesdays; ultimately none of them has a fixed essence. The error is picking one. The teaching runs on both at once.

Understanding it — context, not catechism: how this passage is held

The two truths keep the tradition from talking nonsense in either direction. Conventionally there are people, promises, and consequences, and Buddhist ethics operates entirely at that level; ultimately those are designations laid over processes with no fixed cores. Both statements are true at their own level, and the error is collapsing them — either denying that anything matters because it is all empty, or insisting that conventional things must therefore be ultimately real. Every school has a version of the distinction; they disagree sharply about what the ultimate truth actually is, and whether it can be stated at all.

The same ground, other faiths

claims that share this one's ideas
Life is a dream, and enlightenment is noticing. The Neo-American Church Go deeper →
Every soul is already omniscient. Jainism Go deeper →
Fana. Islam · the interior Go deeper →

The conversation

argument stays attached to the claim it is about All discussion →

Sign in to open the first thread. Everything here is attributed.

Built on Hatchable