You are not baptised into Christ unless you were baptised as a disciple.
The doctrine that defined the movement and separated it from its parent: a valid baptism requires that the person already be a disciple who has counted the cost, which meant almost every previous baptism was void. Converts from other churches, including from the Churches of Christ, were routinely rebaptised.
The disciple-baptism doctrine is the ICOC's inheritance from the Restoration Movement pushed one step further. The a cappella Churches of Christ hold that baptism is immersion of a penitent believer for the forgiveness of sins; the ICOC added the requirement that the candidate must already have made the decision to be a disciple in the full sense taught by the movement, and concluded that baptisms not meeting that standard — including most Church of Christ baptisms — were invalid. In practice this meant almost everyone who joined was rebaptised, including lifelong members of the parent body, and it is the doctrinal reason the two are separate movements rather than wings of one. It also had a social effect: a person's standing dated from their ICOC baptism, which reset their religious biography and put them at the bottom of a structure they then climbed. The doctrine has been softened in some ICOC congregations since 2003 and remains in others.
The same ground, other faiths
claims that share this one's ideasSign in to open the first thread. Everything here is attributed.