Core tenet of Oriental Orthodoxy
The Word has one incarnate nature.
Miaphysis: divinity and humanity united without separation in Christ — the confession Chalcedon's language could not hold.
Understanding it — context, not catechism: how this passage is held
The Oriental Orthodox churches — Coptic, Armenian, Syriac, Ethiopian, Eritrean, Malankara — rejected the Council of Chalcedon in 451 over how to describe Christ's divine and human natures. They hold one incarnate nature of the Word, united without confusion; Chalcedon defined two natures in one person. Modern theological dialogue has largely concluded that both sides meant the same thing in different vocabularies, and joint declarations since the 1970s have said so — but the churches remain separate after 1,500 years.
The same ground, other faiths
claims that share this one's ideas
When dharma decays, the divine descends.
Hinduism
Go deeper →
In Jesus, God became human.
Christianity
Go deeper →
K
Krishna and Rama — the descents.
Vaishnavism · figure
Meet them →
God became human so that humans might become god-like.
Eastern Orthodoxy
Go deeper →
Christ's two natures remain distinct.
The Church of the East
Go deeper →
Haile Selassie I is divinity crowned.
Rastafari
Go deeper →
Sign in to open the first thread. Everything here is attributed.