Doing it without believing it.
Around three-quarters of Japanese people report no religion, and a similar share visit a shrine at New Year. From outside this looks like hypocrisy or cultural residue. From inside it is not a contradiction: the tradition asks for correct practice and never asked for assent, so there is nothing to be insincere about.
Japanese survey data look paradoxical from outside: roughly seventy percent report no religious belief or affiliation, while a similar proportion visit a shrine or temple at New Year, buy charms, hold a jichinsai before building, and have a Buddhist funeral. Reported figures for people affiliated with Shinto and Buddhism, when institutions self-report, together exceed the population of Japan. The resolution is that the Japanese word shūkyō, religion, is a Meiji-era translation coined largely with Christianity in view, and carries connotations of doctrinal commitment, exclusive membership and organised proselytising — which most Japanese people genuinely do not have, and which the Aum Shinrikyo attacks in 1995 made actively distasteful. Shinto never asked for assent to propositions; it asked for correct practice. So a person who visits the shrine, keeps the rites, and says they have no religion is not being inconsistent by the tradition's own standards, only by a definition of religion the tradition did not write. Whether this is a profound point about orthopraxy or a comfortable way of describing habit is exactly the argument, and Japanese scholars of religion conduct it vigorously.
The same ground, other faiths
claims that share this one's ideasSign in to open the first thread. Everything here is attributed.