Zhuangzi.
He argues by telling you a story about a cook, or a butterfly, or a talking skull, and then declining to explain it. Offered a ministry, he asked whether a sacred tortoise would rather be honoured in a temple or alive dragging its tail in the mud, and sent the messengers away.
The Zhuangzi is the second foundational text and it works entirely differently from the Daodejing: it argues by anecdote, and most of the anecdotes are funny. Skulls give interviews, a frog in a well is unimpressed by the sea, cicadas mock a giant bird, and Confucius is repeatedly conscripted to voice Taoist positions. Its central moves are the relativity of perspective — the butterfly dream, the debate about whether fish are happy — and a sustained attack on the usefulness of usefulness. Zhuangzi himself, when the king of Chu sent officials to offer him the chief ministry, is said to have asked whether a sacred tortoise, three thousand years dead and honoured in a temple, would rather have been left alive dragging its tail in the mud, and told them to go away. Its literary influence is difficult to overstate: Chinese poetry, landscape painting, and a good deal of Chan Buddhist rhetoric are downstream of it.
The same ground, other faiths
claims that share this one's ideasSign in to open the first thread. Everything here is attributed.