The altar call.
Charles Finney formalised it in the 1830s with the anxious bench, and it is now how a large share of the world's Christians date their conversion. Critics inside evangelicalism argue it manufactures decisions; it has survived every one of those critiques for two centuries.
Charles Finney formalised the practice in upstate New York in the 1830s with what he called the anxious bench, a seat at the front for those under conviction, and he was explicit that revival was a matter of using the right means rather than waiting for God. That candour scandalised his contemporaries and won the argument: the altar call is now how an enormous share of the world's Christians date their conversion, from Billy Graham's stadiums to Nigerian and Brazilian megachurches. Critics inside evangelicalism — including many Reformed pastors — argue it manufactures decisions, confuses emotion with regeneration, and produces converts who cannot be found a year later. Studies of follow-up rates give that critique real support. It has survived every one of them, because it does something the alternatives do not: it makes an invisible change into a visible act performed in front of witnesses.
The same ground, other faiths
rites that share this one's ideasSign in to open the first thread. Everything here is attributed.
