Core tenet of Judaism

Argument, for the sake of heaven, is sacred.

The Talmud preserves the losing opinions. Machloket l'shem shamayim — disagreement pursued honestly — is not a failure of the tradition; it is how the tradition breathes.

Add to My Beliefs →

Understanding it — context, not catechism: how this passage is held

Judaism is the rare tradition whose central text preserves the arguments it rejected. The Talmud records minority opinions in full, and the stated reason is partly practical (a future court may need to revive one) and partly principled: the losing position is Torah too. The distinction the tradition draws is between argument for the sake of heaven — which endures — and argument for the sake of winning, which does not. Hillel and Shammai are the model; Korach's rebellion is the counterexample.

From the sources — the passages this rests on; concise renderings, cited

These and these are the words of the living God.
Talmud, Eruvin 13b
The heavenly voice's verdict on the schools of Hillel and Shammai — both preserved, one followed.

The same ground, other faiths

claims that share this one's ideas

The councils. Buddhism · community Go deeper →

The books that vary. Christianity · scripture Open the book →

Tafsir. Islam · scripture Open the book →

Gurmatta — the Panth decides. Sikhism · community Go deeper →

Scripture, tradition, and reason. Anglicanism Go deeper →

The umma of scholars. Sunni Islam · community Go deeper →

The conversation

argument stays attached to the claim it is about All discussion →

Sign in to open the first thread. Everything here is attributed.

Where next

← The dead will rise.the previous passage in Judaism The Land is part of the covenant. →the next passage in Judaism Judaism's Belief roomback up one layer Propose a change to this claimone button — it routes to the review pool Branch with this claim changeddisagreement here never has to become an edit war — it becomes a founding