Chant the names, and Krishna is present in the sound.
The Hare Krishna movement, incorporated in New York on 13 July 1966 by A. C. Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupada, then aged seventy: Gaudiya Vaishnavism carried into English, with Krishna as the supreme person rather than one deity among many, the maha-mantra told on beads sixteen rounds a day, and a discipline of vegetarian food offered before it is eaten. Governed since 1970 by a Governing Body Commission rather than by a single successor, which is itself the movement's longest-running argument.
The society's residential gurukula boarding schools in the United States and India were the subject of a suit filed in Texas in 2000 on behalf of more than ninety former students, alleging physical and sexual abuse through the 1970s and 1980s. Twelve ISKCON entities filed for Chapter 11 protection in 2002 and the claims were settled in 2005 for about 9.5 million dollars. ISKCON established its own Child Protection Office in 1998 and has published findings against its own members since. Separately, Kirtanananda Swami, who led the New Vrindaban community in West Virginia, pleaded guilty to racketeering in 1996 — the counts included conspiracy in two killings — and was sentenced to twenty years, reduced to twelve in 1997; New Vrindaban had been expelled from ISKCON in 1987.
Why it is filed this way
ISKCON is a twentieth-century institution teaching a sixteenth-century theology. It places itself in the Brahma-Madhva-Gaudiya sampradaya descending from Chaitanya, and Vaishnavas in India generally accept the claim. It is carried here as a movement because the society itself dates from 1966, not because the lineage is doubted.
The map
The International Society for Krishna Consciousness’s corner of it — solid lines are descent; dotted lines are resemblance only, ideas held in common across unrelated faiths. Click a node to recenter; ✕ returns here. All 171 faiths →Where next
the museum exit — every door leads deeper inSources
1 cited texts
- The maha-mantra, from the Kali-santarana Upanishad where it is cited →
These citations identify texts used in the linked passages. Follow each passage to read its quotation and context. A tradition’s own texts explain its teachings; historical claims may also require independent scholarship. Translations marked (rendered) are our own plain-English wording, not a standard edition; where a passage matters, read it in a full translation.