The devas — gods, and beside the point.
Indra and Brahma turn up in the suttas, ask questions, and lose arguments. Buddhism does not deny the gods; it demotes them. They are long-lived, powerful, and still stuck on the wheel.
Buddhism's devas are the most instructive thing about its relationship to religion generally: it kept the gods and removed their job. Sakka — Vedic Indra, demoted — appears constantly, usually as a decent and slightly out-of-his-depth interlocutor. Brahma Sahampati has the crucial cameo, begging the newly awakened Buddha to teach when he is inclined not to bother, which is the tradition's way of saying that even the highest god needed the teaching and could not produce it. The practical upshot across Asia is that Buddhism never had to abolish local gods to move into a country. It just outranked them.
Teach the dharma, lord. There are beings with little dust in their eyes who are falling away because they do not hear it.
Brahma Sahampati, Ayacana Sutta (rendered)The highest god in the cosmos, asking a human for the teaching.
The same ground, other faiths
claims that share this one's ideasSign in to open the first thread. Everything here is attributed.
