The ancestors — the nearest thing to a god you are related to.
The dead are not independent until their descendants have fed them through the rites, and a line with nobody to perform them is a live anxiety rather than an abstraction. Crows are watched at the shraddha meal because they are said to come as the fathers.
The ancestors are treated as a class of being with an address, a hunger, and a legal claim on their descendants. Between death and full ancestorhood the deceased is a preta, an unsettled ghost with no proper body, and the ten days of pinda offerings after cremation are described as constructing one limb at a time; sapindikarana at the end merges the new dead into the collective of fathers. From then on they are fed annually and named in threes. The practical consequences are enormous and not all comfortable: the preference for sons is partly a ritual necessity, adoption has historically been driven by it, and childless couples in India still feel the pressure in explicitly religious terms. Reform is happening at the edges — daughters performing cremations and shraddha is increasingly common and periodically makes the news — and Gaya, where a single set of rites is held to discharge the obligation permanently, does brisk business from families who want it settled.
The same ground, other faiths
claims that share this one's ideasSign in to open the first thread. Everything here is attributed.
